Wednesday, May 15, 2024
Home Blog Page 56

Four People Die in Alabama After Attempting TikTok ‘Boat Challenge’

At least four people have died in Alabama while attempting a “boat challenge” that’s circulating on TikTok.

In the viral stunt, people are filmed jumping and flipping off of speeding boats into the water — sometimes set to the popular “Oh No” TikTok sound effect.

But Capt. Jim Dennis of the Childersburg Rescue Squad told NBC News that at least four people in Alabama have broken their necks and died attempting this challenge.

“The four that we responded to when they jumped out of the boat, they literally broke their neck and, you know, basically an instant death,” Dennis said.

Although the challenge has been circulating on social media since 2020, the four deaths in Alabama have occurred in the last six months.

TikTok has not removed the videos, but does now place a warning on them, cautioning “Participating in this activity could result in you or others getting hurt.”

“You can wind up with broken bones, a broken neck, or you could end up running into the propeller of your own boat or another boat could run over you and that would cause lots of damage if not death,” Gail Kulp, executive director of the Sea Tow Foundation, told NBC News.

“Hitting the water from a moving boat is like hitting concrete from jumping multiple stories stories up,” Kulp said. She pointed out that if the boat is going fast enough to create a wake, then it’s going too fast for someone to safely jump off of it into the water.

This is not the first time a TikTok challenge has resulted in fatalities or injuries.

In April, a 13-year-old boy in Ohio died after attempting the “Benadryl challenge,” where someone drinks a large amount of the allergy drug to get high.

And for the aptly named “skullbreaker challenge,” teens would jump in the air — but kick the legs out from underneath one participant, which resulted in injuries and deaths.

“I don’t think TikTok is the demon,” Olivia, then a high school junior who suffered a concussion from the “skullbreaker challenge,” told PEOPLE, “but the way we used it needed to be changed.”

And although TikTok has placed a warning on the “boat challenge” videos, the social media platform told NBC News in a statement that “it’s not accurate to characterize or report this as a TikTok challenge.”

TikTok added the company “can’t comment on something that isn’t a trend on our platform.”

The social network does have a section in its community guidelines devoted to “dangerous activities and challenges,” pointing out that “We do not allow showing or promoting dangerous activities and challenges. This includes dares, games, tricks, inappropriate use of dangerous tools, eating substances that are harmful to one’s health, or similar activities that may lead to significant physical harm.”

Court orders INEC to suspend Adamawa REC’s trial

The Federal High Court in Abuja yesterday halted the move to prosecute the suspended Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) in Adamawa State, Hudu Yunusa Ari.

Justice Donatus Okorowo ordered the office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), the Inspector General of Police (IGP) and the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) to maintain the status quo ante bellum.

He held that parties should stay action pending when the respondents show cause why the court should not grant the motion filed by Senator Aishatu Dahiru Binani, the governorship candidate of the All Progressives Congress (APC) in the last election.

The ruling was on a motion ex-parte filed by Binani’s lawyer, former Attorney General of the Federation (AGF) Mike Aondoaka (SAN).

Justice Okorowo was of the view that since issues relating to the conduct and outcome of the election were before a tribunal and parties have submitted to the law, parties should maintain status quo ante belum pending the order to show cause.

The judge ordered the respondents – AGF, IGP and INEC – to appear in court to show cause why the order sought by the Binani should not be granted.

He adjourned until July 18 for the respondents to appear and show cause.

Part of the ruling reads: “It is hereby ordered as follows: the respondents are ordered to show cause why the application will not be granted; parties are ordered to maintain status quo antebellum pending the order to show cause; an order for accelerated hearing is hereby made in this case.”

Before the ruling, Aondoaka said he filed a motion seeking the court’s interpretation of Section 144 of the Electoral Act 2022.

He also prayed for a preservative order for parties to maintain the status quo on issues relating to the case, pending the determination of his client’s substantive suit, marked: ABJ/CS/935/2023.

Aondoaka told the court that his client was challenging the outcome of the election at the tribunal and has Ari listed as his main witness.

The SAN said Ari was being harassed and prevented from giving evidence.

He said if the court did not intervene, and the alleged harassment of the suspended REC persists, it would jeopardise his client’s case before the tribunal.

The ex-AGF then prayed the court to halt the alleged harassment of his client’s star witness.

Binani is challenging INEC’s declaration of the candidate of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) candidate, Ahmadu Fintiri, as the winner.

Ari, a lawyer, courted controversy during the re-run governorship election.

– Advertisement –

He declared the Binani as the winner while the collation of results was ongoing.

INEC overturned his declaration, concluded the collation, and announced Fintiri as the winner.

Following the nationwide uproar Ari’s move generated, former President Muhammadu Buhari ordered the Inspector-General of Police to investigate the incident.

INEC last Thursday said it had filed a six-count charge against Ari

800,000ltrs vessel with stolen crude intercepted, destroyed

The battle against oil theft has recorded a big gain with the interception and destruction of an 800,000 litres vessel laden with stolen crude.

Sixty-four illegal crude oil connections have also been discovered while 77 illegal refineries were destroyed in the Niger Delta last week.

The Nigerian National Petroleum Company Limited (NNPCL) yesterday said its private security contractor, Tantita Security Services, intercepted the vessel. It said the vessel was destroyed.

Chief Communications Officer of the oil giant, Garba Deen Muhammad, said in a statement that the vessel, which was on its way to Cameroon, was apprehended with its captain and crew members on board.

The statement reads: “Following the receipt of credible intelligence, a Private Security Contractor engaged by NNPC Ltd., Messrs. Tantita Security Services intercepted a suspicious Vessel with a cargo of crude oil on board on July 7, 2023.

“The Vessel, MT TURA II (IMO number: 6620462), owned by a Nigerian Registered Company, HOLAB MARITIME SERVICES LIMITED with Registration Number RC813311, was heading to Cameroon with the cargo on board when it was apprehended at an offshore location (Latitude: 5.8197194477543235°, Longitude: 4.789002723991871°), with the Captain and Crew members on board.

“Preliminary investigations revealed that the crude oil cargo onboard was illegally sourced from a well jacket offshore Ondo State, Nigeria.

“There was no valid documentation for the Vessel or the Crude Oil Cargo onboard at the time of the arrest.

“Further investigation into the activities of the vessel at the NNPC Ltd Command and Control Centre also revealed that the vessel has been operating in stealth mode for the last twelve (12) years. The last reported location of the vessel was Tin Can Port in July 2011.

“Details of this arrest and the outcomes of the investigations were escalated to the appropriate government authorities, upon which it was concluded to destroy the Vessel to serve as a strong warning and deterrent to all those participating in such illegal activities to cease and desist.

“Destroying vessels involved in transporting stolen crude oil is of paramount importance as a strong deterrent. The illegal trade of stolen crude oil not only inflicts significant economic losses on Nigeria and legitimate stakeholders in the oil industry, but also perpetuates a cycle of corruption, environmental devastation, and social instability.

“NNPC Ltd. assures Nigerians that we will sustain the momentum in the war against crude oil theft until it is brought to a halt.”

The company also said it discovered 64 illegal crude oil connections and destroyed 77 illegal refineries in the Niger Delta in the past week.

According to the NNPCL, Nigeria lost about $41.9 billion to oil theft between 2009 and 2018.

Transparency Initiative (NEITI) said the country lost 619.7 million barrels of oil valued at N16.25 trillion ($46.16 billion) to crude stealing between 2009 and 2020.

Oil theft has resulted in significant revenue losses for the Federal Government.

Leader of the Niger Delta Volunteer Force (NDVF), Alhaji Mujahid Dokubu-Asari, alleged that over 99 per cent of oil theft in the country was carried out by top military personnel, a claim that was denied by the hierarchy.

Naira rebounds to N744/$ at official market

The closing rate represents an N24/$ gain from Friday’s N768/$ rate.

Market reports showed the naira exchanged at N790/$ at the parallel market, leaving the N46/$ gap between the official and parallel market rates.

Analysts also said Friday’s low closing rate at the I&E window attracted forex buyers interested in getting the greenback at cheaper rates to that segment of the market.

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) unified all exchange rates into the I&E window and allowed market forces to determine exchange rate for the naira.

President, Association of Bureaux De Change Operators of Nigeria (ABCON), Dr. Aminu Gwadabe, expressed concerns about the expanding gap between the official and parallel market rates.

He said the financial sector regulator should find ways to continually narrow the gaps, including bureaux de change operators in the forex market operations.

He advised the CBN to ensure liquidity in the retail end of the market by de-monopolizing diaspora remittances and stronger collaboration with BDCs which control the retail end of the forex market.

Other market analysts from FutureView Securities said forex unification hopes are also being frustrated by the sustenance of the list of 43 items restricted from accessing forex at the official market.

Originally compiled by the CBN in June 2015, the list of items ineligible for forex was intended to manage foreign exchange resources and encourage domestic production.

On his part, former Executive Director, Keystone Bank Limited, Richard Obire, said a key attraction of the alternative market is its “hassle free”, almost zero documentation feature.

He said it will always have that edge over the formal market for certain types of buyers and sellers.

“When supply increases sufficiently to bring forex trades prices down to a stable range, then we may see more people moving into the formal segment of the market.

‘’At this point, buyers will probably place reduced value on the “no documentation” feature of the alternative market and see more attraction in the better price they can get in the official market,” he said.

Govt approvals were given via WhatsApp messages in Ayade’s era – Spokesperson to Gov Otu

Emmanuel Ogbeche, the spokesperson to Governor Bassey Otu of Cross River State, said the new administration inherited a “rundown” state.

The News Agency of Nigeria (NAN) reports that the spokesperson stated this when he spoke with the members of the Nigeria Union of Journalists (NUJ), Cross River State Council, in Calabar on Monday.

Mr Ogbeche stressed that the state was “badly rundown” and that it would require the support and collaboration of all to put things in order.

He, however, said Governor Otu was up to the task of turning things around.

According to him, “Otu inherited a rundown state. It was badly rundown… There is no record of anything; approvals were given on WhatsApp messages.

“It will require a lot to turn the state around, and thank God we have a capable and listening governor ready to provide the needed leadership.”

Speaking further, Mr Ogbeche solicited the NUJ’s support for the governor while promising that the governor would support the union.

He said he was ready to give his all to justify the governor’s confidence.

“This is a job I never lobbied for or didn’t make any call nor contact anyone to secure the job.

“The job found me with God’s grace, and I am ready to do everything to justify that confidence reposed on me by the governor.

“As a member of the union and the immediate past chairman of Abuja council, I will ensure a robust relationship between the governor and the media practitioners in the state,” he stated.

The Chairperson of the NUJ in the state, Nsa Gill, congratulated Mr Ogbeche on his appointment and promised that members of the union in the state would work to ensure he succeeds in his new office.

(NAN)

Ministerial list: Five ex-govs, technocrats lead Tinubu’s 42-man cabinet

Five ex-govs, technocrats lead Tinubu’s ministerial lists

El-Rufai, Ganduje, Bagudu, Badaru, Wike pencilled for portfolios
• State factions submit multiple nominees, as Rivers APC denies ceding slot to Wike
• Placeholder Masari, Rahman, Oshodi, 17 others to be confirmed as aides, given cabinet roles

As the jostle for ministerial list reaches the home stretch, there are strong indications that no fewer than five former governors will feature in the president’s list of nominees that is heading to the Senate for approval between now and next week.

The unusual list, already dubbed the ‘cabinet of (political) unity’, will have nominees drawn from the ruling All Progressives Congress (APC), Peoples Democratic Party (PDP) and many technocrats.

President Bola Tinubu’s handshake across party lines has already elicited contests and intrigues in political camps over choice of suitable representatives in some of the key states.

But there may be enough slots to go round sought-after persons. The Guardian learnt that barring last minute change, the cabinet will be as bloated as what former President Muhammadu Buhari had, but with major realignments in portfolios.

The President has less than 20 days left out of the 60 allowed by the Constitution for him to send his list of Ministers to the Senate for screening.

Yesterday, it was learnt that a 42-member cabinet is being expected because “each state is constitutionally mandated to have a representative at the cabinet and as it was done by the last administration, each of the six geological zones will also have members in the unity government.”

The new cabinet, as gathered, will consist of 42 Ministers and 20 Special Advisers. Some of the remarkable difference from the last administration would be the likely abrogation of Ministers of State. Also, SAs will contribute to discussions at the weekly Federal Executive Council (FEC) meetings.

Also being anticipated is the unbundling of some large ministries into two or three to create enough portfolios for cabinet members. Some of the ministries to be touched include Works and Housing, Agriculture and Rural Development, Humanitarian Affairs, Disaster Management and Social Development, and Youths and Sports.

Those who made the proposed list of 20 expected to serve as Senior Special Assistants (SSAs), Special Assistants (SAs) and Personal Assistants (PAs) are:
Dr Adekunle Tinubu – Personal Physician;

Tunde Rahman – SSAP (Media);

Damilotun Aderemi – SSAP (Private Secretary);

Ibrahim Masari – SSAP (Political Matters);

Toyin Subair – SSAP (Domestic);

Abdulaziz Abdulaziz – SSAP (Print Media);

Otega Ogara – SSAP (Digital/New);

Demola Oshodi – SSAP (Protocol);

Tope Ajayi – SSAP (Media & Public) and Yetunde Sekoni – SSAP.

Others are Motunrayo Jinadu – SSAP;

Segun Dada – SAP (Social Media);

Paul Adekanye – SAP (Logistics);

Friday Soton – SAP (Housekeeping);

Mrs Shitta-Bey Akande – SAP (Catering);

Nosa Asemota – SAP (Visual Communication) Personal Photographer;

Kamal Yusuf – PA (Special Duties);

Wale Fadairo – PA (General Duties);

Sunday Moses – PA (Videography); and

Taiwo Okonlawon – PA (State Photographer).

The proposed nominees, according to a document seen at the weekend, await President Tinubu’s formal approval before it is officially announced. Some of the nominees have actually started working in the assigned roles.

However, state chapters and national secretariat of the APC have been sidelined in the process of recommending the ministerial nominees as “the governors are in charge and states where opposition parties occupy the seat of government, party leaders make recommendations, that is why some states have multiple nominees.”

Some of the governors that might have been penciled down to be part of the final list to be submitted to the senate included former governor of Kaduna State, Mallam Nasir el-Rufai, especially for his role in the emergence of Hon. Tajudeen Abbas as the Speaker House of Representative. Besides, the report of the committee set up by the APC in 2018 on true federalism, which he headed, is said to be one of the major reasons he is being rooted for by Tinubu’s camp.

Others are former governors

Abdulahi Ganduje (Kano),

Abubakar Atiku Bagudu (Kebbi),

Muhammad Badaru Abubakar (Jigawa)

and Nyesom Wike (Rivers).

It was also gathered that former Ogun State governor, Senator Gbenga Daniel is being favoured ahead of Senator Ibikunle Amosun for the ministerial list.

Former governor of Ekiti State, Kayode Fayemi, is also being considered for a Foreign Affairs Minister role. He had served in the last administration as Minister of Mines and Steel.

In Lagos, which is the President’s forte, Senator Tokunbo Abiru, a banker, is being primed to emerge as the new Finance Minister. His switch over from the Senate, where he currently represents Lagos East senatorial district, is to pave way for the return of former Lagos governor, Akinwunmi Ambode, into the President’s political family. After his recent reconciliation with his godfather, Ambode is being positioned to replace Abiru in the Senate.

In Delta State, the APC is uncertain who will be appointed minister following scheming by the different interest groups and camps within the party.
The Guardian gathered that even the leadership of the party was not pushing anyone for the ministerial position, as the floor remained open for anyone interested.

A party source said the party has been polarised into two camps – one led by former deputy senate president, Ovie Omo-Agege, and another spearheaded by Lauretta Onochie and Dr Cairo Ojougboh, who was reportedly expelled from the party.

According to a reliable source: “From the top, the party may decide to pick Festus Keyamo, because he was presidential campaign spokesman and has been assisting the President to defend his case at the tribunal.”

But it was also gathered that another bloc is rooting for Otega Emerhor, with the support of Omo-Agege, since he (Omo-Agege) is still fighting to ‘reclaim’ his governorship mandate at the election tribunal.

In  Cross River State, there were speculations that some party bigwigs have been lobbying Aso Rock for ministerial positions.

Sources in Calabar hinted that interested persons, including the immediate past governor, Prof. Ben Ayade; former senate leader, Victor Ndoma-Egba; APC National Women Leader, who was a former commissioner for Health in the state, Dr Betta Edu; a governorship aspirant in this year’s elections, Senator John Owan Enoh; former party chairman and ambassador, Soni Abang; immediate past Board chairman of Nigeria Ports Authority (NPA) and one-time commissioner for Information, Akin Rocket, and renowned businessman and also a governorship aspirant, Ben Akak, might be angling to be made minister.

While Edu is relying on some party heavyweights, female-folks and ‘office of the First Lady’ to push her cause, Ayade is banking on his influence and connection with some former governors. Ndoma-Egba is counting on his experience and exploring his contacts with his colleagues in the National Assembly to pull through.

However, a group called the All Progressives Congress (APC) Legacy Group, Cross River State, has sounded a note of caution to Tinubu in appointing ministerial nominees from the state.

In a statement issued in Calabar, their leader, Sampson Egom, said: “It is important for the APC and Tinubu to be properly guided before he makes the choice of his minister from Cross River.

“Let the party reward and promote this silent majority, who do not have political godfathers and godmothers,” the statement reads in part.

According to a new amendment to the 1999 Constitution, the President and governors must submit the names of persons nominated as ministers or commissioners within 60 days of taking the oath of office for confirmation by the Senate or state House of Assembly.

President Tinubu was sworn-in on May 29, and already 42 days since coming onboard. The presidential spokesman, Dele Alake, earlier told Nigerians to expect Tinubu’s ministerial roll call within the first 30 days in office, as a departure for his predecessor that took six months to inaugurate one.

In May, Alake said: “A month maximum is enough for any serious government to form its cabinet and put a structure of government in place after the swearing-in”.

But last Thursday, Alake reclined on that timeline, saying it was the President’s sole prerogative to appoint persons into the new cabinet “when he is good and ready”.

Fielding questions from State House Correspondents in Abuja, Alake noted that Nigeria runs a presidential system, which only confers on the President the prerogative power to appoint ministers.

He said, “you know, this is an executive presidency, we’re not running a parliamentary system. So, the bucks stop on his table, and he decides who is fit and proper to make his cabinet list.”
Alake, a Special Adviser on Special Duties, Communications and Strategy noted the avalanche of what he described as ‘speculations’ in the public domain, adding that such reports were mere fabrications.

“I can tell you all those things you’ve been reading in the media are mere fabrications. There is no iota of truth in all those things. When the President is good and ready, you will be the first to know about his intentions,” he said.

Expectations are high that when the list of ministerial nominees is unveiled, notable persons that may not have been prominent in the South-east region or in the APC may form part of it.

The Guardian investigation revealed that Tinubu, to assuage discontents arising from his election, is ready to accommodate politicians and eggheads that could enable his administration achieve a national cohesion. It was gathered that in doing so, he may not rely solely on members of the party that worked for his success in the region.

Towards the end, it was revealed that the list might contain a mix of members, especially of the PDP and APC, adding that the effort was also to strengthen the party in the region.

So far, Tinubu has received ex-governors of Enugu and Abia states, Ifeanyi Ugwuanyi and Okezie Ikpeazu, in that order. They were among the G-5 governors of the PDP. While it is not clear whether Ikpeazu could make the list, that of Ugwuanyi is said to be a done deal based on his closeness with Tinubu and his efforts to unite segments of the country as governor.

In Abia, however, there is a rift between former Minister, Uche Ogar, and the governorship candidate of the party in the 2023 elections, Ikechi Emenike, over control of the party.

The rift has divided members of the party. A source stated that the party might have submitted two lists of potential ministers to the president.
It was learnt that though Ugwuanyi is not of the APC, his mien that has endeared him to all manner of people has become a factor that may earn him a place in the administration of Tinubu.

The other factor is the crisis in the state APC, which has divided the party and limited its chances at the last elections. It was speculated that allowing any of the factions led by Ugochukwu Agballah or Adolphus Ude, among others, to nominate candidates would fester the crisis.

In Ebonyi, there are rumours that former Senate President, Anyim Pius Anyim, may also make the list. Anyim’s closeness with the immediate past governor of the state, Dave Umahi, who will eventually have a say in who should be appointed from the state is said to be a factor.

Anyim had before the election openly endorsed the governorship candidate of the APC; a position that many felt impacted on the performance of Tinubu in the state. Anyim has been received by President Tinubu at the State House.

For Imo state, it will be unlikely for Governor Uzodimma not to have a say in the choice of minister to represent the state.
The crisis in Anambra APC might also make the president look elsewhere for his minister. Only last week, he held talks with the former National Publicity of the PDP, Olisa Metuh.

In a related development, the APC in Rivers State has denied ceding any ministerial nomination slot to Wike.
The state party spokesperson, Darlington Nwauju, made the denial at a press briefing on Wednesday, describing the claim as “the most fantastically audacious of lies”.

Nwauju, while reacting to a publication authored by the former Chief of Staff to the Rivers State Government, and state leader of the Amalgamated Bola Tinubu Campaign Council, Chief Tony Okocha, said, “the state chapter of the party has never interacted with the Amalgamated Bola Tinubu Campaign Council emphasising that there are more than a hundred NGOs and support groups, who worked for the APC in Rivers State.”

NYSC Relocates Plateau Orientation Camp Over Killings

The National Youth Service Corps (NYSC) has announced a change in the venue for the 2023 Batch ‘B’ Stream One Orientation Camp in Plateau State.

The change is as a result of attacks by gunmen that tragically resulted in the deaths of several victims in the Mangu Local Government Area of Plateau State.

On Monday, the NYSC, through its Director of Press and Public Relations, Eddy Megwa, released a statement designed to inform the public, particularly prospective corps members, regarding the new location.

As the statement explained, the permanent orientation camp in Mangu will, for the time being, no longer serve as the venue for the orientation course for prospective corps members.

On the contrary, the camping exercise will temporarily take place at Waye Foundation.

This venue is located by Buken Academy Doi-Du, in Jos South Local Government Area of Plateau State, and has been designated as the interim NYSC orientation camp.

Eddy Megwa emphasized that “All prospective corps members are by this information expected to report at the new orientation camp (Waye Foundation by Buken Academy) on the dates specified in their call-up letters.

“The decision to change the venue of the orientation camp effectively demonstrates the authorities’ commitment to the safety and well-being of corps members.

“By relocating to a more secure area, the NYSC aims to lessen potential risks and establish a conducive environment for the corps members to undergo their orientation training.

“The NYSC remains unwavering in its dedication to the safety and well-being of corps members.”

Manchester United eye £82m boost as more players set to follow David de Gea exit

The summer clearout at Old Trafford has finally begun following David de Gea’s permanent departure from Manchester United. After 12 years between the sticks, De Gea confirmed over the weekend he would be leaving for good following the expiration of his contract, signalling the end of an era for the club.

The 32-year-old was the last surviving player from the Sir Alex Ferguson era and was part of the last United side that lifted a Premier League title a decade ago.

De Gea deserves huge recognition for his world-class rise during those subsequent years, but there is no time for sentiment if United have any serious dreams of lifting the top-flight trophy again.

His departure feels long overdue and a step in the right direction of United’s gradual rebuild under Erik ten Hag, with the focus now on signing a replacement better-suited to the manager’s image.

Ten Hag is looking to streamline his squad by moving on players who don’t quite fit his style of play and replacing them with those who match his strict demands, whether that be as accomplished passers of the ball, or as industrious individuals capable of pressing with intensity.

United will find it difficult to directly replace every player they manage to move on this summer, not that they necessarily need to, but those who leave could actually help to finance any further arrivals.

De Gea reverted to being United’s highest-earner after Cristiano Ronaldo saw his contract terminated last season, and it was quite clear that he was not performing well enough to justify the £375,000-a-week wage any longer.

United sources insist no new contract was ever formally offered to him despite months of discussions. De Gea’s contract expired last week and United initially wanted to hold face-to-face discussions to determine their next steps.

His exit frees up a hefty weekly wage which totals £19.5million over the course of a calendar year. Figures from Sportrac estimate United could eventually save a whopping £1.57million-per-week from ten player departures this summer, which works out at roughly £82million a year.

It is not as straightforward as saying United now have all that money lying around to be spent freely, but it certainly helps them balance the books and plenty of it should be available for reinvestment into the playing squad. Even if these estimates aren’t quite correct – after all a lot of it is guesswork – it is undeniable that United could save a lot of money from moving players on.

United will save an extra £75,000-per-week from Phil Jones’ exit, though these initial wage savings could largely be wiped out by Marcus Rashford’s impending improved deal and the fact some players might be due bonuses after qualifying for the Champions League.

Elsewhere, a number of potential player exits could fee up further funds and significantly boost United’s transfer budget for the rest of the window.

Dean Henderson, Alex Telles, Eric Bailly and Brandon Williams all look certainties to leave and currently earn an estimated £338,000-per-week between them.

It means that even if United struggle to shift some of their unwanted senior stars, they could still shave roughly £41m off their annual wage budget.

Of course, this could improve even further if they do indeed manage to sell others, with Jadon Sancho, Harry Maguire, Fred and Donny van de Beek all candidates to leave should appropriate offers come in.

Not only would that potentially free up £82m in wages across the duration of a calendar year, but United would also receive substantial transfer fees for some of those players, giving them a further financial boost.

Given the limited transfer budget and the ongoing takeover uncertainty, it is clear to see why United are so keen to move on unwanted players this summer.

De Gea’s elongated exit was a step in the right direction towards making this a reality, but it is only the start of the squad rebuild that must be completed this summer.

United estimated wages per week 

  • David de Gea – £375,000 (released)
  • Jadon Sancho – £350,000
  • Harry Maguire – £200,000
  • Fred – £120,000
  • Donny van de Beek – £120,000
  • Dean Henderson – £100,000
  • Alex Telles – £93,000
  • Eric Bailly – £80,000
  • Phil Jones – £75,000 (released)
  • Brandon Williams – £65,000

Ukraine’s Bid for NATO Membership Presents Profound Dilemma for the West

The plea for NATO membership by Ukraine has placed the West in a profound dilemma. President Joe Biden, ahead of his crucial trip to Europe, stated that while Ukraine is not yet ready to join NATO, the alliance itself is also not prepared for Ukraine’s entry. The potential historic step of admitting Ukraine into NATO could serve as a deterrent against Moscow but also carries the risk of escalating tensions and potentially sparking a US-Russia war.

President Biden has made Ukraine’s defense against Russian aggression a cornerstone of his foreign policy, even recently approving the controversial decision to send cluster bombs. However, in an exclusive interview with CNN, Biden sent a strong message to Kyiv that their assertive campaign is unlikely to yield a definite date for NATO membership at the alliance’s summit in Lithuania this week.

While some Eastern European NATO members are eager to welcome Ukraine soon, cautious voices, including the United States, express concerns that rapid NATO membership could provoke direct conflict with Russia—a scenario Biden is keen to avoid.

In the CNN interview with Fareed Zakaria, Biden acknowledged that there is no unanimity within NATO regarding Ukraine’s immediate inclusion, especially in the midst of an ongoing war. He emphasized the need for a “rational path” toward Ukraine’s membership and highlighted certain requirements that Ukraine still needs to meet, particularly in terms of democratization.

Although Biden discussed the issue extensively with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and refused to grant Russian President Vladimir Putin veto power over Ukraine’s future membership, his comments may disappoint Ukraine, which continues to suffer from a brutal war that has witnessed numerous crimes against humanity. Ukraine has often portrayed itself as fighting on behalf of the West against Russian expansionism and weakening NATO’s top adversary in Europe, making a moral case for the defense guarantees enjoyed by NATO member states. However, even Zelensky acknowledges that Ukraine cannot join NATO while the war persists.

Zelensky hinted in an interview with ABC News that he may choose not to attend the NATO summit unless there is more clarity on membership and security guarantees. He stressed that such a move would send a crucial message that NATO is unafraid of Russia.

The Decision’s Significance

Deciding whether to admit Ukraine into NATO is one of the most significant European security questions since previous waves of expansion brought the alliance to Russia’s borders. Advocates argue that this expansion ensured peace in the post-Cold War era by deterring Kremlin aggression. However, critics of enlargement into former Soviet Eastern Europe contend that it humiliated Moscow, turned it into an avowed foe of the West, and ultimately led to the invasion of Ukraine.

Granting Ukraine membership would extend NATO’s sacred pledge that an attack on one member is an attack on all to a nation Russia considers part of its sphere of influence, despite lacking any basis in international law. Such a decision would commit future Western leaders to engage in war with a nuclear-armed Russia and potentially risk a third World War if Russia were to attack Ukraine again.

Supporters of Ukraine’s NATO membership argue that the security and territorial integrity provided to ex-Warsaw Pact nations like Poland, Hungary, and Romania demonstrate the safety Ukraine would experience under NATO’s mutual defense umbrella. This argument is especially compelling as Lithuania, the host of the NATO summit, shares a similar historical vulnerability to Russia before joining NATO in 2004, along with its fellow Baltic states Latvia and Estonia.

The Case for Ukraine in NATO

Proponents of Ukraine’s membership argue that providing ironclad security guarantees would dispel its vulnerability to Russian aggression. They highlight that the vague promise of future membership, first made at the Bucharest summit in 2008 without a realistic timetable, provided an incentive for Russia to invade Ukraine before it joined the alliance.

Ukraine’s accession to NATO would also strengthen its democratic aspirations and align it with the West, a desire shared by many of its citizens. Given the brutal war instigated by Moscow, Russia has forfeited any moral authority to determine Ukraine’s fate. Additionally, Ukraine’s battle-hardened army, with more personnel than most member states, would enhance NATO’s military capabilities.

Sens. Lindsey Graham (Republican) and Richard Blumenthal (Democrat) recently introduced a resolution calling for a roadmap to Ukraine’s NATO membership as soon as feasible. They argue that only through NATO membership can Ukraine achieve true security against repeated Russian aggression and ensure lasting peace.

The Case Against

There are short- and long-term arguments against immediate NATO membership for Ukraine. Biden cautioned in his CNN interview that admitting Ukraine to NATO during an ongoing war would obligate the alliance to defend a new member and prove the effectiveness of its collective defense. The president stressed that he stands by his commitment: “If the war is going on, then we’re all in war. We’re at war with Russia, if that were the case.”

Offering Ukraine a set date for NATO membership after the war could be counterproductive as it could provide Russia with a rationale to perpetuate the conflict. This would undermine hopes for a political settlement if Ukraine’s forces ultimately fail to expel all Russian troops. Moreover, it could bolster Putin’s domestic standing by validating one of his baseless allegations—that the West initiated the war to weaken Russian power and annex Ukraine.

The risk of future clashes with Russia weighs heavily on analysts’ minds. Ben Friedman, policy director at Defense Priorities, argues against guaranteeing Ukraine’s security, citing the risk of war with Russia and potential nuclear escalation. He believes that the United States would gain nothing of security value in exchange for assuming such risks.

The uncertainty surrounding US politics may explain Zelensky’s eagerness to secure Ukraine’s NATO aspirations at the upcoming summit. The potential lack of commitment from future US administrations could undermine treaty obligations and weaken the integrity of the alliance.

Even if Biden were to alter his stance on accelerating NATO membership for Ukraine, he cannot guarantee that his successor would honor those obligations. Former President Donald Trump has warned that Biden is leading the US toward a potential World War III against Russia. Trump has vowed to end the war in Ukraine within 24 hours if reelected, indicating a sympathetic view toward Putin’s goals.

The political situation in the US adds an additional layer of uncertainty, making it crucial for Zelensky to solidify Ukraine’s urgent aspirations for NATO membership at the upcoming summit.

President Tinubu to Announce New Dates for Nigeria’s National Census, Says NPC Chairman

In a significant update regarding the National Population Census (NPC) adhoc staff training, Chairman Nasir Isa Kwarra has revealed that President Bola Tinubu will soon announce new dates for Nigeria’s long-awaited national population and housing census. This news comes as a crucial development in the ongoing preparations for the census, which has seen multiple delays and rescheduling.

During a meeting with State House correspondents, NPC Chairman Kwarra emphasized the importance of avoiding further delays in conducting the census, as it would result in additional expenses for the government. The census, initially scheduled for May 3 to 7, 2023, by the previous administration of ex-President Muhammadu Buhari, was postponed to a date to be determined under the Tinubu administration.

Following his meeting with President Tinubu, Kwarra affirmed that the President is fully briefed on the commission’s plans and processes for the census. He expressed the President’s understanding that any further delay would lead to increased costs for the government.

Kwarra acknowledged that the preparations for the census have already consumed a substantial amount of funds, amounting to N100 billion. However, he assured that future census exercises would be less expensive as they would build upon the foundation established by the current census. He also addressed concerns raised by the NPC commissioner in Ekiti State, stating that if the census does not proceed promptly, additional expenses may be incurred. However, Kwarra assured that the President is receptive to their requests and is fully aware of the implications of further delays.

In response to questions about the expenditure of N200 billion, Kwarra explained that conducting a digital census is a costly endeavor, particularly for a foundational census. However, he expressed confidence that the completion of the census and the resources acquired during the process would yield significant returns, surpassing the implementation cost. Kwarra stated that the government would even have surpluses in its coffers once the census is concluded.

When asked about the nature of the investment, considering that the NPC is not a revenue-making agency, Kwarra clarified that the preparation for the census has generated geospatial data that has the potential to generate income for the government. He emphasized that the geospatial data goes beyond simple scanning and will contribute to revenue generation for the government.

With President Tinubu’s impending announcement of new census dates, the nation eagerly awaits the realization of this crucial exercise that will not only provide invaluable data but also contribute to the economic growth and development of Nigeria.

Find us on Facebook

0FansLike

Weather

Calabar
overcast clouds
25.2 ° C
25.2 °
25.2 °
92 %
0.8kmh
100 %
Wed
33 °
Thu
32 °
Fri
32 °
Sat
33 °
Sun
31 °